Reviewing and Triaging Warranty Requests

Bel Zajic Updated by Bel Zajic

Reviewing and triaging a warranty request involves understanding the issue reported by the requester and determining how it should be handled.

Requests may be received through email or other channels. Regardless of the source, the goal is to ensure the issue is clearly understood and prepared for action. Because workflows may vary across organizations, this section provides general guidance to support consistent review and decision-making.

Key Considerations

When reviewing and triaging a request, consider the following:

  • What home or unit does the request relate to?
  • Who is the requester, and how can they be contacted?
  • What issue is being reported, and where is it occurring?
  • When did the issue start, and is it still ongoing?
  • Are there photos or supporting documents available?
  • Does the issue appear to fall within warranty coverage?
  • Is the issue urgent or a potential safety concern?
  • Is there enough information to proceed, or is follow-up required?
  • Who should be responsible for the next action?
  • Are there any notes related to scheduling or access?
If the request is missing the minimum required information to process the request, then additional investigation may be needed.

Typical Workflow

Step

Action

Outcome

1

Review the requester’s description or inbound email

Understand the issue and the requested outcome

2

Confirm the related Warranty Job or address

Ensure the request is linked to the correct property

3

Determine whether the issue appears warranty-related

Decide whether to proceed within the warranty process or route the request elsewhere

4

Assign responsibility

Ensure a coordinator is responsible for the next action

5

Set initial status and priority

Place the request in the correct queue and urgency level

6

Record any missing information or follow-up required

Provide visibility into outstanding items and next steps

Reviewing Emails in the Email Journal

For requests received by email, the Email Journal is the primary tool used to review and triage incoming messages.

Email Journal Filters and Views

Users can filter and search emails to focus on items that require review.

Filter

Description

View

Select from Pending Review, All Emails, Linked, Ignored, or Failed

Classification

Filter by Automated, Human Request, Reply, Spam, or Unknown

Status

Filter by Manual Review, Auto-Linked, Failed, or New Request Created

Review Status

Filter by current review outcome or in-progress review state

Search

Search by sender address, subject, or email content

Email Journal Columns

The Email Journal displays key information for each email to support review and triage.

Column

Description

From

Displays the sender’s email address

Classification

Indicates the type of email

Status

Shows the system processing state

Review Status

Indicates whether the email has been reviewed

Reviewer

Identifies the user responsible for review

Subject

Displays the subject line

Received

Shows when the email was received

WR#

Shows the linked warranty request, if any

Triage

Triage option such as Claim for Review, Mark as Non‑Support, or Dismiss

Actions

Request actions such as linking, creating, or deleting (discussed in the creating requests article)

Some columns, such as Actions, may not be visible in the default view. Use the horizontal scroll bar to view additional columns.

Automatic Request Creation

In some cases, the system may automatically create a warranty request based on the sender’s email. This reduces manual entry when sufficient information is available. When an email is received, the system checks whether the sender matches a known contact.

Known Contact with One Home

If the sender matches a known contact with one active home:

  • A new warranty request is created automatically
  • The request is linked to that home
  • The email is attached as the original request record

The system applies default values:

  • Status = New
  • Priority = Normal
  • Category = Uncategorized

Known Contact with Multiple Homes

If the sender is associated with multiple homes, the system attempts to identify the correct one based on the email content.

The system checks for:

  • Postal or ZIP Code
    • Canadian postal codes (for example, T2P 1A4)
    • US ZIP codes (for example, 90210)
    • If a match is found, the request is linked to that home
  • Community or Subdivision Name
    • If a matching name is found, the request is linked to the corresponding home

No Matching Contact or Home Found

If the system cannot determine the correct home, or if the sender does not match a known contact:

  • The email is routed to manual review.

Triage an Email

  1. Open the Email Journal
    Navigate_to_Email_Journal
  2. Filter to emails that require review (such as View = Pending Review or Review Status = New)
    Email_Journal_Filters
  3. Select an email subject to preview its contents and attachments.
    Email_List_Selection
  4. Review the message to understand the issue and context
    Email_Preview
  5. Select the appropriate triage option from within the email preview using the Action button.
    Select_Triage_Option
Triage options are also available from the Email Journal list in the Triage column. Both locations provide the same options.

Triage Options

When reviewing emails, users classify and manage messages using the following options:

  • Claim for Review — assign ownership of the email for further review
  • Mark as Non‑Support — identify emails that are not related to warranty work
  • Dismiss — remove the email from active review

After triage, the email can then be acted on by either linking it to an existing warranty request or creating a new request and linking it to a Warranty Job.

How did we do?

Dashboards

Creating Warranty Requests

Contact